≡ Menu

GMC Yukon Class Action Lawsuit Complaint Filed In Florida Federal Court Against General Motors Over Alleged GMC Yukon Tail Lamp Defect.

Owners and Lessors of Certain GMC Yukon Vehicles Including Model Year 2017-2019 Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, or Yukon Denali XL Vehicles File Class Action Lawsuit Complaint Against General Motors Over Tail Lights.

On June 29, 2021, a class action lawsuit complaint was reportedly filed against General Motors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (styled Rhonda Small v. General Motors, LLC, Class Action Case No. 9:21-cv-81146-AMC) alleging, among other things, that the tail lamp assembly of GM Model Year 2017-2019 Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, and Yukon Denali XL vehicles have a defect whereby the tail lamps or particular components within the tail lamp housing or assembly become inoperative (“Tail Lamp Assembly Defect” or “Defect”).

According to the GMC Yukon class action lawsuit complaint, failure of the tail lamp assembly can result in rear brake lights failing to illuminate, which can lead to an increased risk of a rear end collision.

Who Is Included In The Proposed GMC Yukon Tail Lamp Class Action Lawsuit?

The GMC Yukon Tail Lamp lawsuit is reportedly brought on behalf of the following putative class members: 

All persons or entities who purchased or leased in the United States a GM Model Year 2017-2019 Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, or Yukon Denali XL vehicle (“Class Vehicles”).

According to the GMC Yukon lawsuit complaint, the case is also reportedly brought on behalf a Florida class consisting of “All persons or entities who purchased or leased in the State of Florida a GM Model Year 2017-2019 Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, or Yukon Denali XL vehicle (“Florida Vehicles”).

What Claims Are Alleged In The GMC Yukon Class Action Lawsuit?

The GMC Yukon class action lawsuit complaint reportedly brings four Counts, including a claim for alleged Violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301, et seq. (on behalf of the Nationwide Class), Breach of Express Warranties (on behalf of the Florida Class), Breach of Implied Warranties (on behalf of the Florida Class), and Violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”) Fla. Stat. §§ 501.201, et seq. (on behalf of the Florida Class).

What Remedy Is The Proposed Class Seeking In The GMC Yukon Tail Light Class Action Lawsuit?

The plaintiff and the proposed class members in the GMC Yukon tail lamp class action lawsuit reportedly have asked the Court to, among other things, (A) enter an order certifying the proposed Class designating Plaintiff as named
representative of the Class, and designating Plaintiff’s Counsel as Class Counsel; (B) enter an order awarding Plaintiff and the Class members injunctive and declaratory relief; (C) enter an order awarding Plaintiff and Class members compensatory, actual, statutory, consequential, and/or any other form of damages; (D) award punitive damages; (E) enter an order awarding Plaintiff and the Class members restitution, disgorgement and/or other equitable relief; (F) award Plaintiff of the costs of the lawsuit, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expert fees; and (G) award pre-judgment and post judgment interest.

If You Have Thoughts On The GMC Yukon Tail Lamp Class Action Lawsuit, Share Your GMC Yukon Class Action Comments Below.

{ 2 comments… add one }
  • Donald James July 8, 2021, 11:32 am

    I own a Yukon and my tail lights didn;t work properly.

    • Paul Johnson July 20, 2021, 11:10 am

      What year is your Yukon

Leave a Comment