L’Oreal Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum Class Action Lawsuit Complaint

Purchasers Of L’Oreal Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum File Class Action Lawsuit Complaint Against L’Oreal Over Alleged Flammability Risks.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against L’Oreal, USA and L’Oreal USA Products, Inc. (“L’Oreal” or “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (styled Catherine Altamura and Lisa Pearly v. L’Oreal, USA and L’Oreal USA Products, Inc., Class Action Case No. 11-CV-05465) alleging, among other things, that L’Oreal failed to warn consumers that the two main ingredients in its “leave in” hair styling product Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum are allegedy flammable upon contact with temperatures reached by most hair styling appliances, according to the L’Oreal Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz class action lawsuit complaint.

The L’Oreal Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum class action lawsuit complaint is reportedly brought on behalf of the following classes of persons, unless otherwise excluded:

All individuals who purchased Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum in the United States during the period of February 4, 2007 through the present. (“Multistate Class”)

All individuals who purchased Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum in the state of California during the period of February 4, 2007 through the present. (“California Class”)

All individuals who purchased Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum in the state of New York during the period of February 4, 2008 through the present. (“New York Class”)

The L’Oreal Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum class action lawsuit reportedly seems equitable, injunctive, declaratory and monetary relief.

If You Have Thoughts On The L’Oreal Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Anti-Frizz Serum Class Action Lawsuit, Share Your Class Action Comments Below.